Best Online Casinos 2022 - 🥇 Top Online List of Gambling Sites

Money for nothing, yes. Most online casinos now let you deposit money for free. If you deposit a certain amount of money the first time, the casino will match it (up to a certain limit). These types of bonuses are usually in the hundreds of dollars. Make sure to read reviews of good online casinos before you sign up. Almost every online casino lets players set up fake accounts where they can play games and get used to the software without spending real money. You can always play for free until you feel ready to bet real money. One of the best things about online casino games is that you can try them out for free. Players who are sure of themselves do well. Visit bluechip app.

Yesterday in a case related to insider trading at Coinbase (go figure), Amp token was described as a “security” by the SEC.
Naturally, though not necessarily understandably, this caused a stir; but quacking ducks sometimes draw attention too.
Let me explain.
Going back to 2018, ex-CFTC chair Gary Gensler, who was then Chairman of the Maryland Financial Consumer Protection Commission, inferred Bitcoin and its forks, Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash, etc. were commodities, while Ethereum and its ICO ilk were securities. This was 2018. In the following year, a little project called Flexa raised well over $10 million selling 12 billion tokens called Flexacoins in private sales to accredited investors, etc. Flexacoin, an Ethereum based token, was at the time an unregistered security claiming 506(b) of Regulation D exemption status (for small, early stage entities) with the SEC.
Fast forward to today, and last month Gensler, now SEC chair, again reiterated that Bitcoin is not a security but a commodity. And yesterday, along with 8 other tokens, Amp, an Eth-based token and Flexacoin’s successor, was described as a security.
A quick primer on what is a security.
Securities are financial instruments, specifically, contracts, such as equities, debts, etc. that meet the following four criteria:

an investment of money
in a common enterprise
with the expectation of profit
to be derived from the efforts of others

The criteria used to determine the definition of a security stem from a 1946 Supreme Court case called SEC v. W.J. Howey Co. Today timid investors/uptight regulators refer to the guideline as the “Howey test.” (The term “security” originally dates to the 15th century and signifies “securing”/assuring a financial transaction; it does not differ much from the conventional term meaning “safety” and/or “freedom from danger, fear, or anxiety.” Though some, cough degen traders, would quickly beg to differ. I kid, in essence it is a guarantee of financial ownership and all its trappings, allowing for transferability.)
So ducks are ducks. And ducks, besides quacking as ducks do, like to fly.
Nevermind Coinbase’s hot mess. Or Gemini’s. Or the hot mess that is any for profit casino moonlighting as a dignified centralized exchange singularly focused on making it rain for that matter.
What matters is Amp’s real utility, which is directly collateralizing value transfers resulting explicitly — in Flexa’s particular case — from consumer demand, which just so happens to be the single biggest factor driving the largest economy in the world; consumer spending makes up nearly 75% of US GDP. Now that’s what I call a use case.
How does Amp’s status as a security change the dynamic for current as well as future investors? Well, for current investors, as explained above, nothing changes per se. From day one, Flexa and its token component have been nothing but compliant. The regulating authorities are now simply catching up to what we as savvy (can’t speak for the more degen members of our family; but you are no less loved!) investors always already new. So while some labels might change — or more accurately, simply get put in print — the fundamentals are the same. Which leads me to my last point regarding future investors.
Remember how ducks like to fly? If you saw a duck, but weren’t fully sure it was a duck, would you make a bet with your friend that the questionable duck could fly? Probably not, unless you were a true degen. Now let’s say a biologist with a PhD in duck studies (ornithology?) confirmed that the questionable duck was in fact a duck. Will you now comfortably, perhaps eagerly make the bet with your friend that the duck can fly? Yes.
The main takeaway for the SEC’s pretty thorough description (16 paragraphs, if I recall correctly) of Amp as a security is the following: gargantuan, dignified entities of the bespectacled variety will now feel 100% more comfortable dipping their toes in the crypto pool, so long as that pool is called Amp (won’t comment on the 8 other cryptos for no reason other than the fact that this is an Amp sub). I repeat, more clarity from regulating authorities such as the SEC, CFTC, and any other relevant organization, regardless of conclusion, is welcome and bullish. Because despite the great strides crypto has made since the early teens, there is still a significant majority of investors, both massive and small in size, waiting prudently on the sidelines for just the kind of clarity the SEC delivered yesterday (no matter how circuitously).
Amp is officially a security according to the SEC? Well the only entities disapproving of the news are criminals; whereas all entities rejoicing are of the kind I like to call BASED (read: large + legitimate).
But wait, there’s more! This being a pampening post, albeit in the dog days of summer, several tangential notes:
A little explainer on the oft misused term “utility token.” A lot in the crypto space have been flinging around this convenient term without really understanding its meaning. A utility token is any asset that enables the owner to do something outside of what a security enables (trading, voting, etc.). So, critically, Amp is not merely a representation of equity in the Flexa project, nor is it a utility token in some generic sense because it simply helps Flexa network run, but it is a utility specifically because its bespoke smart contract capabilities (partitioning, etc.) built for and thus allowing collateralization of value transfer such as consumer spending enables owners to literally secure and essentially form a novel pure digital payment rail in a seamless (instant, cost free) way. This is an important distinction to understand. People must pay for electricity and natural gas to use the Internet and heat their homes. So they are utilities, not securities, because of their unique usefulness as forms of energy, without which the Internet would fail and people would freeze. Money itself would not power the Internet or warm a house. Likewise, one can give Flexa all the cash (or bitcoin) in the world, but without Amp/its unique smart contracts, there can be no novel (instant, secure, low cost, scalable) pay rail. Hence Amp explicitly and inherently has usefulness beyond simply “securitizing” (à la tradable financial instrument) Flexa’s or any other participating entity’s endeavors.
Which brings me to my next note. In 2018, the SEC, under Jay Clayton, actually opined that Ether and similar assets are not securities. Specifically, while their original ICOs may have been security offerings, the resulting progressing development and changing nature of the utility of such projects and their respective coins/tokens caused an evolution from security to something else. This contradicts Gensler’s current positioning on the issue — or rather, Gensler is disagreeing with the SEC’s prior opinion. The point is that crypto is still extremely new and hard to define. Some contain characteristics of commodities, some securities, and some hybrid if not something else entirely. Yesterday Amp was labeled a security. Flexacoin was already labeled a security (via exemption filing) in 2018. Yet, there is still an argument to be made that Amp possesses qualities that make it very different from any traditional security currently in existence. For instance, no publicly traded share possesses built in smart contracts, thereby granting the owner full, autonomous ownership of a decentralized collateralization protocol that is not exclusively utilized by and affiliated with any one company but potentially literally an infinite number of companies, if not sole individuals. And the smart contracts themselves via Amp ownership are inherently useful, meaning they do not explicitly exist for profit’s sake (nor even explicitly exist to help a company do business for profit’s sake) — they simply collateralize value transfer, nothing more and nothing less. And so owning the smart contracts via Amp ownership does not directly infer expectation of profit — just the expectation of collateralizing value transfer. And while the term “smart contract” contains the word “contract” in it, which is arguably what a security is, a share of Amazon constitutes a contract of ownership in the company, whereas an Amp token does not constitute a contract of ownership in Flexa or any other Amp related entity, but instead constitutes literal ownership of the Amp token’s smart contracts themselves, which as previously described enable something useful (other than trading/voting rights corresponding to stock in a company), which is seamless, decentralized collateralization of value transfer. So to own Amp tokens is to own the literal infrastructure of Flexa, not Flexa as a company. Whereas owning Amazon shares entitles one to owning a portion of Amazon the company, but not Amazon’s literal infrastructure itself. (An Amp owner can unstake Amp from Flexa and use it anywhere else, including at a Flexa competitor; whereas an owner of Amazon shares cannot take some portion of Amazon infrastructure, like a truck, and use it at FedEx.) In other words, if Amp is truly a security, it sure is a special one. Maybe super? Like a super security. Or maybe drop the outdated “security” moniker and call it something new, to better represent its innovative, original qualities which are, surprise, new.
So it seems despite all the pomp and circumstance, the almighty SEC may currently be stumped by a classic case of semantics. And laziness.
Ok, last (and probably most pertinent [to some of you]) note. What happens if Amp is truly, officially labeled a security, meaning not tangentially via some insider trading case but formally via regulation? What happens to the investors, the dealers, and drum roll, the token price, if not existence? Before I discuss, please reread the long paragraph preceding this one to understand the real ambiguity regarding Amp’s status. When it was released in 2020, it almost certainly did not pass the Howey test (in fact, it seems to fail 3/4 requirements). Nonetheless, let’s just pretend it gets officially regulated and enforced as a security by authorized entities. Firstly, American exchanges will be in trouble. Due to the scale and optics of crypto in 2022 (pre 2018 would be a completely different story, meaning jail time), think lawsuits and fines, and potentially insolvencies (not solely due to Amp but assuming many others also get formally regulated as securities). Nothing more. Fortunately (Amp team seemed to have played it wise) Amp is not limited to the US. Moreso, Amp is not limited to merely centralized dealers but is active with many decentralized entities too. So secondly, Amp will survive. But what of its price. Price is fully dependent on liquidity, but that beast bites both ways. Meaning, there could be an initial drop in liquidity, as US is far and away the largest market, but significant price moves including to the upside as a result of low liquidity conditions could easily happen. Regardless, this period would be temporary as the new safe label of “security” would entice sidelined bluechip whales to enter once exchanges adapt to regulation. Liquidity will thus return in a big — actually much bigger — way and it’s off to the races once again. All this to say, current investors/holders throughout this process (which, again, may not necessarily occur for Amp) will deal with nothing new, save for some extra paperwork/accounting and a temporary period of custodial rearrangement for US based participants. Ultimately, business as usual. Par for the course. Liquidity fluctuations, price speculation, followed by an incremental realization of a promise of paradigm shifting giga utility? Been there, done that. We’re all Groundhog Day veterans here. HODL — FUD — and HODL.
Sources:
https://techcrunch.com/2022/07/21/the-sec-digs-into-unregistered-crypto-securities-in-insider-trading-case-against-former-coinbase-employee/
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2022/comp-pr2022-127.pdf
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgadata/1743323/000174332318000001/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgadata/0001743323/000174332319000001/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml
https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2018/04/24/everything-ex-cftc-chair-gary-gensler-said-about-cryptos-being-securities/
https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/IF11657.pdf
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/howey-test.asp
https://www.investopedia.com/termsunregistered-shares.asp
https://blog.coinbase.com/coinbase-does-not-list-securities-end-of-story-e58dc873be79
https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8540-22
https://www.sec.gov/news/public-statement/enforcement-tm-statement-potentially-unlawful-online-platforms-trading
https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/crypto-exchanges-the-sec-s-proposed-9029987/
https://cassels.com/insights/sec-declares-bitcoin-and-ether-as-non-securities/
https://cointelegraph.com/news/btc-bull-michael-saylor-ethereum-is-obviously-a-security/
https://www.gemini.com/blog/gemini-galactic-markets-approved-for-finra-membership-and-broker-dealer
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/business_law/publications/blt/2017/04/06_loev/
https://www.winston.com/en/crypto-law-cornewhen-is-a-crypto-asset-a-security-and-why-does-that-matter-part-i.html
https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/speech-hinman-061418
https://reason.com/2018/06/26/what-happens-if-cryptocurrency-technolog/
https://qz.com/1262864/is-ethereum-is-a-security-the-answer-could-upend-the-cryptocurrency-world/
https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/investing-basics/glossary/rule-506-regulation-d
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-17/chapter-II/part-230/subject-group-ECFR6e651a4c86c0174/section-230.506
https://www.sofi.com/learn/content/what-is-a-utility-token/

When you look at an online casino, you should look for information about the percentages of how much money they pay out. Many online casinos report their payout rates once a month. If you think that a casino has an advantage because it has a higher payout percentage, you should know how independent the audit of this information is. Before begin playing at any online casino you should be aware of the available financial options. The best online casinos usually have a lot of ways to deposit and withdraw money. You should also check the limits on your transfers, which may apply in some cases and be a bad thing about this casino. Visit bluechip apk.

When you play at online casinos, you won't have to think about how hot it is in Las Vegas in the summer. You don't need an umbrella or heavy coat to get into an online casino, no matter what the weather is like. Don't forget that you don't have to go to a casino. Whether it's raining, snowing, or shining, you can sit in your favorite comfortable chair at home and log on to a great adventure. A lot of people who like to gamble can't afford to live in Vegas or don't even want to go there. With the wonderful new world of online casino gambling, you can play from the comfort of your own home and save both time and money. The money you save from not having to travel can be turned into a bigger bank-roll for you to budget. You could also save money by not having to travel. Visit bluechip apk.

If you can use the Internet, you can choose from a huge number of that are always open. You can play at online casinos for real money no matter where you are on the planet. Also, these online casinos have so many great games to choose from that even the pickiest player will have fun and might even win a lot of money. Some land-based casinos have dress codes for people who want to bet a lot of money. Now, you can even play the more formal version of Baccarat in your bathrobe if you want to. You don't have to dress up because you'll be playing in your own home. No one will care how you look at all. Now you can wear that ugly but very lucky poker cap you love so much without people looking at you funny. Visit bluechip apk.

First of all this is just a personal opinion trying to think different from the regular perspective on crypto.

Alright, so crypto space is around 10 years old maybe abit more, with a marketcap of around 2, 2.5 Trillion dollars on average. As we all know since mostly last year more and more people joined crypto space becoming pretty much mainstream as of now! If i ask 10 friends about crypto 9/10 heard about it or invested already.
Let's have a look at the coins/tokens we have, mainly let's have a look at, fundamentals & price of BTC, ETH and ALTS.
BTC is the oldest one in the books, the "king" as most people call it, a store of value similar to Gold. Yet being so, Bitcoin in it's core is rarely used as a payment method, it is outdated, and people invest in it just because it is the "bluechip" of crypto. Their money safehaven. As of now BTC is around 700 billion dollars market cap. From this price realistically speaking a 2x is possible, maybe 3x if you stretch it. WHY? ... just because we are not in 2013 anymore when its marketcap was low and it needed just a few couple of millions to pump its price 10x, let alone it's outdated functions. And please STOP believing those 500, 1 mil price predictions. You are just getting fooled by the whales to throw in more money and to create them the opportunity to sell and take what you invested. I still remember 100k price prediction for last years EOY. For 1 mil price to happen it would mean 18 Trillion dollars for BTC alone, even 100K needs around 2T. That to me is hardly achieveable since the whole crypto market is at 1.7T as of now with a peak of 3T when BTC was 69k.
ETH the queen of crypto, high gas fees blockchain network, getting more hate by each day passing from people. It sits around 300 billion dollars marketcap as we speak. I see this one doing a 3-4x at best since it's strongly corellated to BTC movement. Again let alone all the downsides of this network, we are looking at a token that needs huge money inflow to make more X's and at the current stage i see none of that happening, that would mean to either flip BTC or BTC to go over 1.5,2 T in value alone.
Those 2 are considered the safest bets in crypto space because they survived all bearmarkets and turned out good. If we look just at those 2 assets, we have generously speaking a 3-4x opportunity but not in a short period of time, maybe in 5y-10years. So we can't expect huge explosions like we've seen in the past just because the market now is starting to be correlated to stock market and more and more institutions control it with huge ammount of money.
I know most people will yell but there are many ALTs. YES there are! but here we enter the lottery space. None of the coins/tokens below BTC/ETH are somewhat guaranteed chance of success after a bearmarket. If you noticed when BTC bleeds -50%, ALTs go - 80-90%. That is a huge blow from which they have to recover, but most of them never reach their ATH's ever again. If we look at their applicability in real life, almost none of them have real usecases, so to me they are just pure speculative asset built on hype. For a retail investor who is DCA-ing monthly into crypto, he will need to be extra careful to not lose his money with ALT's. They may win during a bullmarket if they got in at the right price, but if they HODL during bear and that coin never reaches what it once was, most of the people will be hugely dissapointed about crypto.
For a regular like me, i neither millionaire nor really poor, i just monthly spend some part of my income into crypto assets but im trying to stay away from delusional hopes of 10x on ETH or Bitcoin and be extracareful with which ALT tokens i choose. I hope you dont take my post as a rant towards crypto market. It's just my opinion about how i see things at the moment. It's still a high volatility market but not as high as we've used to in the past years. A 2-3x on TOP COINS wont make us rich if we dont bring big money to the table and We Are Not All Gonna Make It if we care just about ALTs.
If you want to realistically make it in crypto you either: 1. Joined during early years of it's existance or in it's -80% bearmarkets and believed in it and HODLd (diamond hands) - didnt require huge money invested.

Joined in 2021 or later - will require you a few thousand grand invested to get a feeling of actually winning something if you invest in proper coins/tokens.
Played your hand with some ALT coins and got really lucky. Like at casino, you did 10x in a short period of time on that Floki Shibu Inu Doggy Coin you found in the depths of the market cap (this solution isnt for the average Joe investor)

TL;DR Crypto has aged, became mainstream, institutions brought in big money, no more huge explosions in price will happen as it did back in the past years. Crypto market is starting to be regulated and corlelated to stock market.
BTC & ETH are your only safe bets, but realistically they cannot do more than 2-3x in the future without having their fundamentals changed or upgraded.
Stop believing in what popular crypto personalities say about price prediction. They usually try to fool retail investors into filling their pockets. They sell you dreams.
ALTs are Lottery, no real usecases for most of them. All they do is promise and underdeliver. If you are looking for that 10x coin, you will lose 10x times of your money till you find it.
We are not all gonna make it! As of now we need either big money to make some, or have some extreme luck.

I feel like a lot of folks around here have only one strategy : DCA, hold and hope for the best. And while it's certainly a great idea for bluechip projects, it comes with an opportunity cost. Today, as the market dips, I wanted to share some strategies for the more adventurous traders.
1-Stake and forget. This is the most well-known and easiest one. Instead of just buying, you stake your tokens in a smart contracts to help secure the network, and you get a return on your investment. Many exchanges offers this service, minus an administration fee. I personnaly think that Kraken is the best option (fees are 15%), but there are numerous other options. You can get around 5% annually for your ETH this way. For those with more then 2-3 ETH, I'd recommand to go with a decentralised protocol, such as RocketPool.
2-Yield farming. For more advanced traders, yield farming is a great option to protect part of your investment. The goal here is to add liquidity to token pairs on decentralised exchanges. Say you hold ETH and BTC ; you wrap the BTC into wBTC, go to Sushiswap, and add your tokens to the ETH/wBTC pair. Voilà! You are now earning swap fees on every transactions on this pair. I'd recommend to use a hardware wallet for those kind of transactions, as you will be on your own if something bad happens.
3-Short the market. Beware : it's a risky thing to short such a volatile asset as cryptocurrencies. But when done right, it can generate great returns. I like to see shorting as a form of insurance policy ; I regularly open small short positions, with stop-losses, to hedge my ETH holdings. During the crash last night, I recovered a portion of my losses this way.
4-Rainbow-Weighted Averaging. Put simply, it just means to buy more when the price drops. I know, it's counter-intuitive. Dollar-cost averaging, by definition, means you invest the same sum of money week after week. But if you plan to hold long-term, buying more when the price decreases is a good strategy if you have fiat available. Here's a very good thread posted three weeks ago that explains this strategy.
5-Sell covered calls. For this one, you will need to get prepared in advance. The strategy here involves buying BTC futures in a regular broker account, then to sell covered calls on those futures. Options selling is a bit quite complicated, but if you have 2-3 hours to read about them, there's no reason not to try it. For Canadians, it's even easier, because we already have access to both BTC and ETH fully-backed ETF, and we can even hold them in tax-free accounts.
Disclaimer : I am a long-term holder of crypto and I don't expect a long-term bear market anytime soon. But I wrote this post because I often see people feeling helpless when the market crashes. There's always a way to make money in this casino!

Of course you can ask me, what is Blue chip poker?
and i will be happy to answer you.💯

BlueChip Poker--TheBlueChip Poker is the first casino game, powered by BlueChip. Enjoy and earn BCP. It is a game where you can connect your Ethereum Mainnet by pressing "Connect" in the bottom part of our website. Then, approve the allowance for BCP Poker token, and then start you game and win your "jackpot".

Play, enjoy and earn BCP!🔥🔥🔥🔥
http://play-demo.blueswap.net/

🟢Release Date: 27th, May Enjoy with Demo first
🟢HUMAN VS HUMAN
🟢Public Room - Randomize Match
🟢Private Room - Special Offers
🟢3% fee

BLUECHIP PROTOCOL is here for you💯
Stop wasting money for worthless Tokens & NFTs start multiplaying your crypto like a professional and join one of many crypto casino tokens which name is BCP!🔥🔥🔥🔥 You can ask me, what is BCP? and i will answer you exactly. -Blue Chip Protocol (BCP), which emerged by leveraging the power of the Ethereum network, is a multifunctional token developed for online poker sites. BCP, which has many features such as investment, farming and swap, is known to be among the first tokens for poker applications. 📌Blue Chip Protocol (BCP) is among the tokens with high potential. Developed for use in online poker sites, BCP provides the trust of investors with its many functions. BCP, which has much faster and lower transaction fees than online betting tokens. It is prepared to meet your needs in this field.
🤑 https://www.blueswap.net/#about
🟢 Up to 500% deposit profit from the start of the sales 🟢 Claim free tokens! 🟢Great communtiy 🟢 Find the best Crypto poker clubs with us! 🟢 SUpported by ETH and ATRIUM Blockchains
The fun doesnt end here! there are more exciting updates for you just join us on the journey to success 🚀🚀🚀

Comparing the big market cap coins BTC and ETH to other kinds of investing, how 'safe' of an investment do you consider it to be?
Let's say 'safe' refers to the amount of certainty that you don't lose more than inflation over a 2 year time period. 1 is quite unsafe for the average invester and 6 is really safe.
I personally consider being brief one of my qualities. The rules of this sub say this post is better quality if I add 189 more characters so ~~let's~~ let us ('let us' is 1 more character!!) go.
View Poll

Background
IL casinos reopened last week. Drove down (about a 45 minute drive) this past Saturday only to find out that they were limiting how many people were in the casino and there was a 30+ minute wait (in the cold) so we decided to cut our losses and return home. I was bummed but my wife already wasn't excited about going to rivers. She prefers Potawatomi (Milwaukee) but they have removed all tables..hence my desire to go to Rivers (they do have 3 bubble machines at Potawatomi but not the same to me).
Because my wife wasn't too excited about going to Rivers, I knew my time might be short. I was hoping she would have a good day on the slots so I could play a while....but I also didn't want to push it too much as I'm hoping to go back down again and didn't want her annoyed waiting for me while I'm having fun.
The Casino
We had a snow storm come through the area on Tuesday and work was slow so we decided to try Rivers again Tuesday afternoon. The place was busy but not crazy and they had a lot of tables running. From a craps perspective, I counted 5 tables (one $5, three $10, and a $15). 3 to a side. One thing that surprised me is they were apparently short 'boxmen' as I only counted two and they were bouncing between tables, primarily handling cash and coloring up. My dealer took my cash and gave me chips without a boxman at the table. The table I joined ($5) was full but there was at least one $10 table with only one guy at it when I left.
As far as other table games go, Blackjack had $10 & $15 tables I saw and Ultimate Texas Hold'em had $5 and $15 tables. I'm sure there were other games being run but those are my jam so that is what I noted.
My short time playing Craps
I must have pulled up at the right time as a spot was open at the $5 table. Point was either 8 or 9 so I waited to join. They had just hit all the small and were one away from all the tall (I believe the 9). The guy to my left played a heavy lay bet as he had $10 on the all. The next roll hit the point and the roll after got them all...I believe a roll or two after 7'd out. I got in after the point was hit and ended up losing a little of my starting ($300) bankroll. I was playing the line with heavy odds (100x at rivers).
After that the dice made a fairly quick pass around the table. I rolled poorly in my first time rolling. Going into the casino, I assumed they would only have $15 tables so I wanted to try placing a $30 6/8 and then lowering it to table minimum after the first hit. Since I was at a $5 table, I adjusted a bit to play the line with odds but still placed a $30 6/8 on some shooters. That didn't work too well my first time at bat. I believe by the time it came back to me, I was down to my final $100. I played a similar strategy. I usually only play ATS when I roll which I did ($5 minimum). I hit a couple 6/8's but was down so much that I abandoned my strategy of lowering my wages after the first hit (I came to play, right?). Ended up hitting all the small and only had a 9 left on the tall. The guy to my left again, played a heavy lay bet against the 9 but I took a chance....I should have followed his lead as the next roll was a 7,
At this point I was close to my starting bankroll (I believe the small paid $160). I played the line and the point started at an 8. I placed the 6 for $30 and $25 odds. What I didn't do was play ATS. I mean...what are the chances.....but the guy to my left was having a good day. He played $5/$15/$5 on the ATS I believe. By now you probably see where this is heading....all the small was again hit first (again)...I don't recall what the last number was on the tall but he did his heavy lay ($900 I think) but hit it for a $2000 plus payout.
I ended up with $450 after tipping. My wife was having horrible luck at the slots and wasn't 'in the mood' so we weren't even there an hour (that's right....1.5 hours driving round trip and less than an hour at the casino). It felt like I should have been up a lot more but points weren't actually hitting that much...I hit my place bets a few times and then I hit the small once. But it was fun to see my 'teammate' next to me go up probably $3k in the short time I was there....I don't even think he was playing much outside the line bet and the place bets I mentioned.
All in all...a fun time was had. Wish I could have played longer (of course) but leaving with a 50% profit and not annoying my wife too much is a win in my book. Now I just have to wait for my next trip to Michigan/Indiana (Four Winds/Bluechip) next month.

In light of a recent attack on a Republican congress, which will surely be hastily forgotten, I've decided to bring up two incidents in USA history which you may or may not know about (more likely not). When I first came across The Days of Rage I was positively shocked - from the sheer scale of the terrorist attacks, to the fact that some of those terrorists got cushy jobs, *specifically cushy jobs that involve them in a position of power over another generation. So let me bring up two incidents in USA history which will shock you.

Rajneeshee bioterrorist attack

An Indian guy named Osho created a cult in which he mixed Hindi mystic teachings and "open attitude towards human sexuality", greatly influencing "Western New Age" nonsense you might find soccer moms into. Cult had relocated to Wasco Country in Oregon, where they built a facility known as Rajneeshpuram. Osho had built himself a sex cult, where he taught his followers "unusual" sexual practices, instructed couples to have sex in front him, sleeping with several of his female disciples, etc. The cult was very wealthy, with Osho owning 93 Rolls-Royces, while his followers went on a building frenzy, building a small college with 15 classrooms, four office buildings, gambling casino, shopping center, winery, crematorium with a surrounding spiritual area, 18 miles of paved roads, more than 250 small visiting huts, a 4200 foot long airport runway and airport terminal and more.
The cult intended to expand, and while they had initially friendly terms with locals, the relations soured. Wasco Country restricted growth of the commune, and the sect's leaders formulated a plan in which they will poison the public officials, which would naturally deter future decisions against their operations. They poisoned Ray Matthew and Bill Hulse, the latter who remained in hospital for four days, with doctors telling him he would have dided without treatment. He concluded that Rajneeshee poisoned him, a fact they denied vehemently. But they didn't stop there. In order to gain building permits for Rajneeshpuram, they decided to take political control of this county. One member, shedding traces of affiliation with the group opted to run for the county office. To elect her, they came up with two schemes.
First, under the guise of humanitarian initiative they would import a large number of homeless people (predominately men), promising them food, shelter, and beer. However, the 80s were a marginally saner time and their plan was countered by making sure that all new voters had to submit their qualifications when registering to vote. The homeless, a lot of them having mental issues, turned into an unruly mob and to regain control, cultists drugged their beer with Haldol.
Second, and this is the fun part, they decided to incapacitate voters in The Dalles, where most of the voters were. They planned to do this by infecting the water supply with salmonella. However, they first decided to do a "try run" where they poisoned salad bars. During this month, 751 cases of acute gastroenteritis were documented, with all of the victims being infected with Salmonella enterica Typhimurium. This remains to this date the biggest bio-terrorist attack comitted on US soil. I don't know how many died, but probably not that many - antibiotics helped make sure of that. However, keep in mind that in the last couple of decades, antibiotic resistance amped up. Imagine how easy would it to procure MRSA.
It ended rather poorly for the cult, for two reasons. One, county officials denied many cultists (not being American citizens) voting rights, whilenew regulations on registration of new voters prevented imported homeless from voting. Two, people don't take kindly to being poisoned. The mastermind behind this attack, a rather wealthy Indian-American woman named Ma Anand Sheela, was given 20 years in federal prison. She served 29 months, because of good behaviour - despite the fact that she was known for outbursts of profanity. Oh and, guess who was part of this cult? Arianna Huffington, of Huffington post.

Jonestown massacre

The Peoples Temple of the Disciples of Christ was founded in 1955 by Jim Jones. Jim Jones was attending gatherings of Communist Party USA and he became frustrated with ostracism of open communism in USA. He came to conlusion that best way to demonstrate Marxism is through infiltration of the church. He himself was surprised when church helped him into it, despite him being known communist. And thus he founded The Peoples Temple of the Disciples of Christ. During this time, he adopted memes of Southern Baptists and their weird healing rituals, masking his communist intentions.He was a rather radical integrationists, who helped racially integrate churches, restaurants, hospitals, and the police department. He helped fish out restaurants who refuse to service black customers. In fact, in 1977, he recieved MLKJr. Humanitarian reward. Racial equality was a big thing for him, his latter settlment (Jonestown) being 70% black, 45% being black women.
During the 60s, he slowly started injecting more and more Marxism, declaring those to be born in socialism to not be born in sin, rejecting the Bible for oppressing women and non-whites - slamming it on the table yelling "I've got to destroy this paper idol, while also claiming he was reincarnation of Ghandi, Jesus, Buddha, and Lenin. In one sermon, he said : "There's no heaven up there! We'll have to make heaven down here!". In private phone calls, he admited that he was an atheist, and that he only used religion to mobilize people. In the 1977 he openly said that he was an atheist. He is a classical example of an entryist, albeit a rather obvious one.
Unlike most cult leaders, he was able to gain public support in San Francisco, and on the national level. Walter Mondale, 42nd Vice President (although candidate at that time) came to meet him, and Mondale publicly praised the temple. First Lady Carter also met with Jones and corresponded with him - and when he spoke at the grand opening of the Dem Party's San Franciso, he garnered a larger applause than her. Besides being written about in the newspaper, and seen with dignitaries at lunches and dinners, he was also the head of the Human Rights Commission and the SF Housing Authority. He was a popular guy.
Like the Rajneesh cult, he created a settlement named Jonestown as a means to attain socialist paradise and sanctuary from the vile media scrutiny in San Francisco (this is sarcasm btw)- and like other communist paradise, it was a failing agricultural community, with people being stored in bunkbeds. Children were generally surrendered to communal care, addressed Jones as "Dad", and at times were only allowed to see their real parents briefly at night Up to $65,000 in monthly welfare payments from U.S. government agencies to Jonestown residents were signed over to the Temple. He claimed it to be the purest communism ever, and like many of other pure communist, he did no permit members to leave. However, some people wanted to leave.
Those people formed a group called "Concerned Relatives" and called for the investigation into human rights abuses. On April 11, 1978, the Concerned Relatives distributed a packet of documents, including letters and affidavits, that they titled an "Accusation of Human Rights Violations by Rev. James Warren Jones" to the Peoples Temple, members of the press, and members of Congress. In June 1978, escaped Temple member Deborah Layton provided the group with a further affidavit detailing alleged crimes by the Temple and substandard living conditions in Jonestown. If someone's interested, she hosted a reddit AMA right here.
On November 17, 1978, Leo Ryan came with delegation to investigate claims of abuse within the compund. During this visit, a number of members expressed a desire to leave, and so they did. A member named Larry Layton, wanted strongly to join them - despite other defectors voicing their concern about his motives. And they were right because at the local airstrip at Port Kaituma, they were intercepted by self-styled Temple security guards who killed Congresman Ryan - who became the first congressman to be killed in the line of duty, three journalists, and one of the defectors.
After these murders, Soviet Union, with the Temple had been negotiating a potential exodus for months, would not take them after the airstrip murders. Jones, if you hadn't noticed, was batshit crazy, and had a vague conspiracy theory of how that men would "parachute in here on us", "shoot some of our innocent babies" and "they'll torture our children, they'll torture some of our people here, they'll torture our seniors". He also feared that hostile forces would convert captured children to fascism, one temple member states "the ones that they take captured, they're gonna just let them grow up and be dummies". Naturally, the only logical conclusion is to commit a revolutionary suicide.
And this is where it gets fun. There is a 44 minute recording of what happens next. There's also a transcript here.
One member, Christine Miller, dissents toward the beginning of the tape. She was shouted down by the rest of the group. He goes on about how he loves them all and did his best to give them a good life, that he doesn't want them to "be in hell" anymore. The crowd cheers. There is children crying and screaming throught the background. There is occasional applause and riffraff among the crowd, you can hear children and crying babies. Other people speak into the mic thanking him throughout the recording, saying they accept death and are ready to end it all. There were people with guns, ready to shoot anyone who tried to leave. He ordered his congration to drink a cheap Kool-Aid knockoff (he was a dick till the end, it seems) laced with cyanide. According to escaped Temple member Odell Rhodes, the first to take the poison were Ruletta Paul and her one-year-old infant. Clayton said that Jones approached people to encourage them to drink the poison and that, after adults saw the poison begin to take effect, "they showed a reluctance to die. The people who refused, got shot, or injected with it. They decided to give the drink to the children first, thinking it would kill the parents will to live if they saw their children die. They forced the parents at gunpoint to force children to drink it. Children start screaming, and crying, with one child shouting "what did you give us" through tears. Jones screams "Don't be this way. Stop with these hysterics. No way for socialists and communist to die. We must die with some dignity. Stop this. Put the children to rest. Mother, mother, mother don't do this." A child screams "what did they give us". He interjects "Children will not be hurt if you are quiet". Death, death, death is common to people. And the Eskimos, they take death in their stride. Let's be digni--let's be dignified. If you quit tell them they're dying--if you adults would stop some of this nonsense. Adults, adults, adults. I call on you to stop this nonsense. I call on you to quit exciting your children when all they're doing is going to a quiet rest. I call on you to stop this now if you have any respect at all. Are we black, proud, and Socialist, or what are we? Now stop this nonsense. Don't carry this on anymore. You're exciting your children.
Jones did not drink it. His death was caused by a gunshot wound to his left temple. he events at Jonestown constituted the greatest single losses of American civilian life in a deliberate act until the incidents of September 11, 2001. 909 inhabitants of Jonestown, 304 children died.
Child sacrifice to progressivism is nothing new, from Moloch cults to skoptsy in Russia. If they're willing to kill their own children, imagine what they would do to yours. Ultimately, their death and dissolution happened only because Jones was insane. The public was on his side, the politics were on his side, and the minute there is a bump, he freaks out and does something crazy as this.
Ultimately, these two cults are firsts in so many things. First congresman killed, largest bioterror attack in USA, and largest deliberate loss of civilian life until 9/11 in USA. Funnily, the tantric sex cult was miles more advanced that communist utopia, which was a failed community filled with insane and evil people. Both cults showed behaviour consistent with progressivism, in an open and unashamed fashion - importing underclass to take political control, corresponding to political elite during the so-called Red Scare. And both cults would only get a slap on the wrists, hadn't Jones completely went off the rails. In an ironic fashion, he punished himself and his followers many times more harshly than he would actually done.
I am reminded of Angela Davis, person who supplied guns to a black man who killed a judge and freed his two fellow dindus. She was declared a terrorist, and hunted down - meanwhile many crazies like Lenon wrote out in support to her. After her capture, she was found innocent - after all, she couldn't have been guilty in a plot to break out two dindus, all she did was give the guns. She became a professor (now retired) at the University of California, Santa Cruz, in its History of Consciousness Department and a former director of the university's Feminist Studies department.
The amount of things the Left did in pre-internet era, and got away with it, is simply mind-boggling.

Best Online Casinos 2022 - 🥇 Top Online List of Gambling Sites

BlueChip : Online Casino in India

SEC labels Amp a security; also, ducks quack, and they like to fly

Sports betting

BlueChip : Website for Online Betting

BlueChip Sports betting

Fri Jun 3 00:25:06 2022

Why i think we are late to the crypto party!

Five ways to make money/increase your stack during a correction

Sat Oct 30 23:20:48 2021

BLUE CHIP POKER IS COMING!🔥🔥🔥🔥

BLUECHIP PROTOCOL TOKEN🚀🚀🚀

Say you're 100% into BTC and/or ETC. How safe of an investment do you consider it to be?

Craps at Rivers (Des Plaines, IL) - Tuesday 1/26

Two incidents in history of USA.